Skip to content

Conversation

@chungjac
Copy link
Contributor

@chungjac chungjac commented Aug 4, 2025

@amazon-inspector-ohio
Copy link

⏳ I'm reviewing this pull request for security vulnerabilities and code quality issues. I'll provide an update when I'm done

@amazon-inspector-ohio
Copy link

✅ I finished the code review, and didn't find any security or code quality issues.

@chungjac chungjac changed the title Revert "fix(amazonq): update LSP client info name for sagemaker unified studio" test(amazonq): test Aug 4, 2025
@chungjac chungjac closed this Aug 4, 2025
@chungjac chungjac reopened this Aug 4, 2025
@amazon-inspector-ohio
Copy link

⏳ I'm reviewing this pull request for security vulnerabilities and code quality issues. I'll provide an update when I'm done

@amazon-inspector-ohio
Copy link

✅ I finished the code review, and didn't find any security or code quality issues.

@chungjac chungjac changed the title test(amazonq): test fix(amazonq): revert update LSP client info name for sagemaker unified studio #7786 Aug 5, 2025
@chungjac chungjac changed the title fix(amazonq): revert update LSP client info name for sagemaker unified studio #7786 fix(amazonq): revert update LSP client info name for sagemaker unified studio (#7786) Aug 5, 2025
@chungjac chungjac changed the title fix(amazonq): revert update LSP client info name for sagemaker unified studio (#7786) fix(amazonq): revert update LSP client info name for sagemaker unified studio #7786 Aug 5, 2025
@chungjac chungjac marked this pull request as ready for review August 5, 2025 00:05
@chungjac chungjac requested a review from a team as a code owner August 5, 2025 00:05
@chungjac chungjac merged commit 639d035 into master Aug 5, 2025
51 of 53 checks passed
@chungjac chungjac deleted the revert-7786-master branch August 5, 2025 00:12
parameja1 added a commit to parameja1/aws-toolkit-vscode that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants